Army’s complaint against poor ammunition quality a ploy to promote privatisation?


The Indian Army has deployed its T-90 and T-72 battle tanks in the Chumar-Demchok area in eastern Ladakh to deter any misadventure by Chinese troops. At 15,000 feet, it's possibly the world’s highest battlefield for tanks. But what perhaps worries the Indian soldiers more than the altitude and the threat from China could be the quality of their ammunition. 

According to a report prepared by the military , faulty ammunition supplied by ordnance factories have caused quite 400 accidents within the past six years, leading to 27 deaths and 159 injuries. 

“On an average, one accident takes place every week,” said the report, which also revealed that the Army has suffered a loss of Rs960 crore since 2014 on account of faulty ammunition. It said the Army could have purchased around hundred 155mm artillery guns with the money it lost. Former Army chief General (retd) V.P. Malik flagged the issue as a serious one. “It directly affects the morale of the troops and their confidence in their weapon systems,” he said. 

The ordnance factory board (OFB) refuted the allegations and said only 2 per cent of the accidents were caused by faulty ammunition. It blamed poor gun maintenance and faulty firing drills for the alarming numbers. 

The board also acknowledged that between 2011 and 2018, quite 125 accidents were caused by ammunition procured from foreign and domestic sources aside from the OFB. Responding to the Army’s view that it could have bought 100 artillery guns with the cash it lost, the OFB mentioned the Army’s controversial purchase of ammunition from Russia during the Kargil war. By the same logic, it said, the “faulty Krasnopol ammunition imported from Russia during the Kargil war, amounting to Rs522.44 crore, could have financed another 55 artillery guns”. 

The OFB’s history goes back to 1775 when British government officially recognised the Malay Archipelago Company’s Board of Ordnance in Fort William, Calcutta. The first factory, called the Gun Carriage Agency (now Gun and Shell Factory), was opened in 1801 at Cossipore in north Calcutta. The OFB now has 41 factories, 13 development centres and nine institutes of learning, which are administered by the department of defence production under the ministry of defence. These are divided into five operating divisions supported the products they provide starting from ammunition and explosives, vehicles and weapons, material and components, and armoured vehicles and equipment. 

Some defence ministry insiders expressed concern that a company lobby was trying to weaken the OFB. “Currently, hundreds of thousands of (rounds of) defective imported ammunition are available in various depots,” said an OFB official. Malik said even a single accident was unacceptable. “It is that the question of a rifle failing when a soldier is close to fire at the enemy. When the barrel bursts, not only does expensive equipment get damaged, but precious lives of soldiers are also lost,” he said. 

OFB officials said a choice was made in 2013 to check random samples whenever ammunition was handed over to the military . They said the test had shown that up to 99.8 per cent of the samples didn't have any problems which most of the accidents happened due to training errors, expired ammunition and faulty, incompatible weapons.



Hari Mohan, who retired in September as chairman of the OFB, told THE WEEK that there was a deliberate plan to malign the ordnance factories. “First of all, the military should have shared its report with the OFB.” He said ammunition supplied by the OFB was involved in just 19 per cent of the accidents, while the remaining cases were being ignored. Mohan also highlighted the fact that the OFB supplied ammunition at a much lower price compared with international market prices. 

The Army, however, said the OFB overcharged its products, hurting the defence budget. It also accused the board of maintaining a monopoly over several essential products, resulting in minimal innovation and slow technological development as there was hardly any incentive to improve quality, cost-efficiency and accountability. 

OFB sources said the military had a mechanism to watch the standard of the arms and ammunition it produced. The directorate general of quality assurance (DGQA), which is headed by a lieutenant general, certifies everything from ship to shoelaces made for soldiers. There are DGQA units in all ordnance factories, headed by a colonel-rank officer known as senior quality assurance inspector.

Lieutenant General (retd) V.A. Bhat, who had served as director general of quality assurance, said the OFB wasn't owning up to its responsibility. “The first party quality check by the ordnance factory is practically absent. From empty shell check to field check, the ordnance factory has to inspect everything. The DGQA has only a limited role.” He blamed the OFB for not implementing the Six Sigma methodology recommended by multiple experts committees, which emphasised the reduction of faults and accidents to three .4 occurrences per million units or events. 

OFB sources said the timing of the allegations against the board was suspicious because it coincided with the Narendra Modi government’s plans to corporatise the OFB. The Army said corporatisation would put the OFB at par with other defence public sector undertakings, which were managed by their own board of directors under broad guidelines from the government. The government hopes corporatisation will help the OFB improve its turnover from Rs12,000 crore to Rs30,000 crore by 2024-25.

Lieutenant General (retd) Sanjay Kulkarni, who was director general of infantry, said corporatisation was the sole way forward due to the trust deficit between the OFB and therefore the Army. As part of the corporatisation plan, the Union government will support the OFB in case of losses, with a loan for 30 per cent of the total shortfall and equity investment for the remaining 70 per cent. The government also will provide capital for the primary five years as a one-time corpus fund. 

Subhash Chandra, who had served as secretary, defence production, said four committees had recommended the corporatisation of ordnance factories within the past. In August 2019, a cupboard note was prepared for the method . In September this year, the govt constituted an empowered group of ministers (EGoM) under Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to oversee OFB’s corporatisation and also selected a consortium led by KPMG Advisory Services for assisting in the process. 

Opening up the ammunition sector to non-public players, the military has recently given a minimum of five contracts to non-public firms. “We need a parallel capacity to return up, although it's going to not get on the size of the OFB,” said general officer Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, master-general of the ordnance, in a recent media interaction. OFB employee unions are against the move. M.K. Ravindran Pillai of the workers Federation of the OFB said the govt was looking to encourage private participation as a part of the Make in India initiative. 

“Recent trends in defence procurement have shown a shift away from heavy reliance on ordnance factories and defence PSUs,” said Pillai. OFB workers have meanwhile deferred their indefinite strike against corporatisation, which was scheduled to begin on October 12, after the defence ministry offered to negotiate with them. A. Bharat Bhushan Babu, additional director general (media and communication) within the defence ministry, said the ministry wouldn't alter service conditions of the workers till the conclusion of the talks. “However, it will not affect the government’s decision to corporatise the ordnance factory board,” he said. 

Malik said the present controversy should not degenerate into a turf war between the Army and the OFB. “The defence ministry should have a composite committee to investigate the matter in a time-bound manner,” he said. “A detailed investigation will establish the exact cause of the accidents.”

Source- The Week

Post a Comment

0 Comments